Google is getting VERY good at catching spun content so you'd better be talented at manual spins. If they DO catch you, of course they'll spank you... and hard. So anything you use spun content on is inherently AT RISK. Worse yet... Google gets better at finding spun/poor content every year. So in the longrun you're screwed. I'd weight your other options and see if you couldn't find a cheaper source for manually hand written content.
Hey Cathy, thanks for sharing about WordAi. It certainly is interesting, to say the least. I guess at some point all of us would want to automate our business and will look into programs like these for a solution. The example you showed gave me a very clear indication that the algorithm isn’t quite there yet. You seem too lenient in grading it because to me, it is practically unreadable. I believe hiring writers is a better use of that money.
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Spinnerchief.com, 23% (11 requests) were made to Whitehatbox.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Js.users.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Spinnerchief.com.
Hi there! SpinnerChief is the best article rewriter tool, because it can not only generate hundreds of new articles in minutes, but also it can rewrite articles to a very high level of human readability and uniqueness. By using the best Natural Language Analysis and Artificial Intelligence techniques, it can understand your articles in the same way as Google does and create content that is close to human quality.
If you have not used a spinner before then I would suggest that you first use something that require more human imput like The Best Spinner or Spinner Chief in order to understand the basic principles. However if you must go fully auto then I would suggest you go for Wicked Article Creator. I have it and understand it is similar to wordAI but a one off fee of $47.
Looking at both spinner’s spun articles, they both seem to generate spun content that looks pretty good. Both have some grammar issues I would correct if I was posting it on a high tier 1 site, but overall SpinnerChief produced better content. Not sure if WordAi is being overly aggressive on the spins at the cost of quality. This test is very hard to call. If you go by raw numbers, SpinnerChief won. I want to leave this up to you to decide which one won. Winner none – draw!