This is absolutely useless. It claims it rewrites English sentences, but it just offers words alternatives, which is only nouns. Also, most of those suggested alternatives are unable to use. If you see their maker's home page, Whitehat Box, you can see numerous people request the refund. It's far from western progressive software like Grammarly or sketch engine. They stole my money with the diceiptive advertisement.

There is also the option to spin capitalized words (assumed to be proper nouns) as well as leave any number of words unchanged, depending on whatever you enter into the "ignore" field, separated by commas. You also have the option to only keep the sentences that were altered a minimum percentage, as indicated by the "Keep Sentences that Changed" option.


"It is my pleasure to give testimonial about this spinner tool. I think this is great and highly recommended tool to build a many unique articles for our internet marketing world. At the first time, I already see about another great spinner tools, but it is not free. And fortunately for me, I found spinnerchief. The free tools which have almost the same quality with another cost spinner tools. I already use spinnerchief to build many articles to attract traffics for my below minisite"

Looking at both spinner’s spun articles, they both seem to generate spun content that looks pretty good. Both have some grammar issues I would correct if I was posting it on a high tier 1 site, but overall SpinnerChief produced better content. Not sure if WordAi is being overly aggressive on the spins at the cost of quality. This test is very hard to call. If you go by raw numbers, SpinnerChief won. I want to leave this up to you to decide which one won. Winner none – draw!
Customer Testimonials — Disclaimer: The testimonials displayed on this website were sent to us by our actual customers and were not altered in any way. Some of the testimonials also display a photo of our customer who sent us that particular testimonial — we always obtained our customer's full permission to use their photo as part of their testimonial. With this in mind, of course every user is different so we want to point out that while these results are possible, they are not guaranteed by us (as the product vendor). The results described are not typical and not experienced by every one of our customers.
So you are still doing it? I have stopped using spin content after panda update way couple of years ago. As content become king and the user expereince the key to earn website authority, I started focusing on writing more meaningful and engaging content. I never cam across any spinner that time which makes total sense after spinning. The spin content either looked very bad or it needed manual review. I forgot the name of the spinner tool as well. Looking forward for replied from more experts here as it could be an eye opener for me if spinning still works.
Always start with quality content: Quality content means is a unique content on a very specific topic. You have to create unique valuable content which will be more informative for human readers. It’s impossible for a program to produce content that is engaging the users because it just replaces few words without any writing skill. So, It’s a big risk for you if you start with low-quality content and the more risk if you are going to use the alternate version of the articles.
This time, WordAI calculates the spin it generated at 97% uniqueness which is basically completely unique. If you look at the text above, again, the first sentence of the quoted content is a bit confusing, but the rest is still good. I would even say that the last sentence came out better than the previous spin, but generally, yes, the above spin looks more like a human wrote it.
https://www.inetsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/WordAI-Ultimate-Tutorial-And-Honest-Review-Innovative-Content-Spinning-Software.jpg 1200 1920 root https://www.inetsolutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Inet-Solutions-Symbol-Plain18-80x80.png root2016-03-03 15:51:322016-03-03 21:58:36WordAI Ultimate Tutorial & Honest Review - Innovative Content Spinning Software

You do not have to bring about any sort of the change in the structure of the paragraph sufficiently. It would be such an easy way out if you will be jotting down with the notes and explain out with some of the main points into the paragraph. You should be hence rewriting all by means of using the notes and not the original one. Proofreading the document as about 2-3 times definitely.


Owner is a scammer who has been banned from major SEO forums for fraudulent and deceptive practices. You might be willing to look past the fact that the owner of this product creates fake accounts to post fake reviews and lies about the product if the product itself was actually good, but unfortunately Spinner Chief itself is filled with half baked buggy features (which are advertised as working completely) and can't go more than 10 minutes without crashing. All in all it is a complete waste of money and time.  

Spin Rewriter 5.0 technology was a previous edition that allowed their clients to use the basic article rewriting system.  Their newer versions over the years have just kept getting better and better.   The new Spin Rewriter 9.0 technology gives you the option of assigning variables to your content.  Their software is dead easy to use.  In just three steps you can have up to 50 uniquely spun articles.
!function(n,t){function r(e,n){return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,n)}function i(e){return void 0===e}if(n){var o={},s=n.TraceKit,a=[].slice,l="?";o.noConflict=function(){return n.TraceKit=s,o},o.wrap=function(e){function n(){try{return e.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw o.report(e),e}}return n},o.report=function(){function e(e){l(),h.push(e)}function t(e){for(var n=h.length-1;n>=0;--n)h[n]===e&&h.splice(n,1)}function i(e,n){var t=null;if(!n||o.collectWindowErrors){for(var i in h)if(r(h,i))try{h[i].apply(null,[e].concat(a.call(arguments,2)))}catch(e){t=e}if(t)throw t}}function s(e,n,t,r,s){var a=null;if(w)o.computeStackTrace.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement(w,n,t,e),u();else if(s)a=o.computeStackTrace(s),i(a,!0);else{var l={url:n,line:t,column:r};l.func=o.computeStackTrace.guessFunctionName(l.url,l.line),l.context=o.computeStackTrace.gatherContext(l.url,l.line),a={mode:"onerror",message:e,stack:[l]},i(a,!0)}return!!f&&f.apply(this,arguments)}function l(){!0!==d&&(f=n.onerror,n.onerror=s,d=!0)}function u(){var e=w,n=p;p=null,w=null,m=null,i.apply(null,[e,!1].concat(n))}function c(e){if(w){if(m===e)return;u()}var t=o.computeStackTrace(e);throw w=t,m=e,p=a.call(arguments,1),n.setTimeout(function(){m===e&&u()},t.incomplete?2e3:0),e}var f,d,h=[],p=null,m=null,w=null;return c.subscribe=e,c.unsubscribe=t,c}(),o.computeStackTrace=function(){function e(e){if(!o.remoteFetching)return"";try{var t=function(){try{return new n.XMLHttpRequest}catch(e){return new n.ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")}},r=t();return r.open("GET",e,!1),r.send(""),r.responseText}catch(e){return""}}function t(t){if("string"!=typeof t)return[];if(!r(j,t)){var i="",o="";try{o=n.document.domain}catch(e){}var s=/(.*)\:\/\/([^:\/]+)([:\d]*)\/{0,1}([\s\S]*)/.exec(t);s&&s[2]===o&&(i=e(t)),j[t]=i?i.split("\n"):[]}return j[t]}function s(e,n){var r,o=/function ([^(]*)\(([^)]*)\)/,s=/['"]?([0-9A-Za-z$_]+)['"]?\s*[:=]\s*(function|eval|new Function)/,a="",u=10,c=t(e);if(!c.length)return l;for(var f=0;f0?s:null}function u(e){return e.replace(/[\-\[\]{}()*+?.,\\\^$|#]/g,"\\$&")}function c(e){return u(e).replace("<","(?:<|<)").replace(">","(?:>|>)").replace("&","(?:&|&)").replace('"','(?:"|")').replace(/\s+/g,"\\s+")}function f(e,n){for(var r,i,o=0,s=n.length;or&&(i=s.exec(o[r]))?i.index:null}function h(e){if(!i(n&&n.document)){for(var t,r,o,s,a=[n.location.href],l=n.document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=""+e,h=/^function(?:\s+([\w$]+))?\s*\(([\w\s,]*)\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,p=/^function on([\w$]+)\s*\(event\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,m=0;m]+)>|([^\)]+))\((.*)\))? in (.*):\s*$/i,o=n.split("\n"),l=[],u=0;u=0&&(g.line=v+x.substring(0,j).split("\n").length)}}}else if(o=d.exec(i[y])){var _=n.location.href.replace(/#.*$/,""),T=new RegExp(c(i[y+1])),E=f(T,[_]);g={url:_,func:"",args:[],line:E?E.line:o[1],column:null}}if(g){g.func||(g.func=s(g.url,g.line));var k=a(g.url,g.line),A=k?k[Math.floor(k.length/2)]:null;k&&A.replace(/^\s*/,"")===i[y+1].replace(/^\s*/,"")?g.context=k:g.context=[i[y+1]],h.push(g)}}return h.length?{mode:"multiline",name:e.name,message:i[0],stack:h}:null}function y(e,n,t,r){var i={url:n,line:t};if(i.url&&i.line){e.incomplete=!1,i.func||(i.func=s(i.url,i.line)),i.context||(i.context=a(i.url,i.line));var o=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(r);if(o&&(i.column=d(o[1],i.url,i.line)),e.stack.length>0&&e.stack[0].url===i.url){if(e.stack[0].line===i.line)return!1;if(!e.stack[0].line&&e.stack[0].func===i.func)return e.stack[0].line=i.line,e.stack[0].context=i.context,!1}return e.stack.unshift(i),e.partial=!0,!0}return e.incomplete=!0,!1}function g(e,n){for(var t,r,i,a=/function\s+([_$a-zA-Z\xA0-\uFFFF][_$a-zA-Z0-9\xA0-\uFFFF]*)?\s*\(/i,u=[],c={},f=!1,p=g.caller;p&&!f;p=p.caller)if(p!==v&&p!==o.report){if(r={url:null,func:l,args:[],line:null,column:null},p.name?r.func=p.name:(t=a.exec(p.toString()))&&(r.func=t[1]),"undefined"==typeof r.func)try{r.func=t.input.substring(0,t.input.indexOf("{"))}catch(e){}if(i=h(p)){r.url=i.url,r.line=i.line,r.func===l&&(r.func=s(r.url,r.line));var m=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(e.message||e.description);m&&(r.column=d(m[1],i.url,i.line))}c[""+p]?f=!0:c[""+p]=!0,u.push(r)}n&&u.splice(0,n);var w={mode:"callers",name:e.name,message:e.message,stack:u};return y(w,e.sourceURL||e.fileName,e.line||e.lineNumber,e.message||e.description),w}function v(e,n){var t=null;n=null==n?0:+n;try{if(t=m(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=p(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=w(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=g(e,n+1))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}return{mode:"failed"}}function b(e){e=1+(null==e?0:+e);try{throw new Error}catch(n){return v(n,e+1)}}var x=!1,j={};return v.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement=y,v.guessFunctionName=s,v.gatherContext=a,v.ofCaller=b,v.getSource=t,v}(),o.extendToAsynchronousCallbacks=function(){var e=function(e){var t=n[e];n[e]=function(){var e=a.call(arguments),n=e[0];return"function"==typeof n&&(e[0]=o.wrap(n)),t.apply?t.apply(this,e):t(e[0],e[1])}};e("setTimeout"),e("setInterval")},o.remoteFetching||(o.remoteFetching=!0),o.collectWindowErrors||(o.collectWindowErrors=!0),(!o.linesOfContext||o.linesOfContext<1)&&(o.linesOfContext=11),void 0!==e&&e.exports&&n.module!==e?e.exports=o:"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define("TraceKit",[],o):n.TraceKit=o}}("undefined"!=typeof window?window:global)},"./webpack-loaders/expose-loader/index.js?require!./shared/require-global.js":function(e,n,t){(function(n){e.exports=n.require=t("./shared/require-global.js")}).call(n,t("../../../lib/node_modules/webpack/buildin/global.js"))}});

Always start with quality content: Quality content means is a unique content on a very specific topic. You have to create unique valuable content which will be more informative for human readers. It’s impossible for a program to produce content that is engaging the users because it just replaces few words without any writing skill. So, It’s a big risk for you if you start with low-quality content and the more risk if you are going to use the alternate version of the articles.
Sometimes the tools called paraphrasing tool, why it is so called? As the tool use the logic of changing words according to its synonyms to make an article unique and meaningful. If we expand the main logic behind the tool use the word synonyms of targeted article that you will rewrite or spin, giving you the options to replace the word from its dictionary suggested by the boot as well as option to write your own, it’s simple but it’s superb.
Spin Rewriter 9 rewrites content on paragraph, word and sentence level. It also turns sentences around and makes sure that only appropriate synonyms are used. Aaron added a special ARTICLE GENERATING ALGORITHM to Spin Rewriter 9.0. This algorithm makes sure that the generated articles are even more unique, and even more readable — if that was even possible!
Anyone can do this, all you need is a computer and the ability to string a sentence together. You can write original articles and submit them to article directories and get paid. You have to apply to these sites and may or may not get turned down. If you should happen to get turned down then just keep plugging away until you find someone to "hire" you.
In this harsh industry who can't implement a small number of extra profit? Another upside will be that you can construct right up your cache of primary subject material and help to increase your good reputation for posting and potentially attract some more significant paying users. Lastly, simply just believe that of the experience you can be developing by owning to groundwork some of the ideas you generate about. You can be, or will be soon, a fountain of inadequate information.
×