Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.
Spin Rewriter 9.0 is designed to create lots of content. You can give the software any article that you find online and the software will produce multiple (re-written) versions of the text. This means that you can quickly create 5 or 10 articles that can be distributed around the internet. This might sound like an easy way to write lots of content, but things aren’t always that simple. Many bloggers who don’t want to spend time creating their own content use this kind of software to produce their articles. Normally the results are really bad. But Spin Rewriter 9.0 claims to be different. Very different in fact…
It looks like the creators of Spin Rewriter 9 .0 have really put a lot of work into creating a piece of software that creates readable content. However, Google isn’t stupid and there are a lot of things that can go wrong when you are trying to “manipulate” Google into giving you more traffic. Google hates spam, badly written content and duplicate content. These are all things that Spin Rewriter 9 .0 is capable of creating. You simply can’t trust a piece of software to write content for you in my opinion.
So you are still doing it? I have stopped using spin content after panda update way couple of years ago. As content become king and the user expereince the key to earn website authority, I started focusing on writing more meaningful and engaging content. I never cam across any spinner that time which makes total sense after spinning. The spin content either looked very bad or it needed manual review. I forgot the name of the spinner tool as well. Looking forward for replied from more experts here as it could be an eye opener for me if spinning still works.
WordAI is probably the most famous content spinning service. Many people swear by it and the quality of the content it produces and it is not empty talk. But let’s see how it will spin my short story. WordAI has two modes of spinning – “Standard” and “Turing”, with the latter being the one that produces better results. I will spin the text with both of them.
So it is pretty hard actually to achieve unique and human readable article, but with little twists it can be done. I needed my wordai account just for FCS Networker, but I figured out that Spin Rewriter will fit perfectly for me because of their affordable price. If you need article spinner just for seo purposes, avoid them. If you want to create amazing articles, yes they are very good ..but pricey as ****…
Plagiarism is copying someone else's work (in this case, a quotation, sentence, article, review, essay, essay, etc.) and assigning it to yourself, thus concealing the real author. We divide plagiarisms into explicit, hidden, total, partial and autoplagic. Open plagiarism is one of the most common types and consists in taking over the entire work or a specific fragment and signing it with your own name. The other one is hidden plagiarism, that is, assigning a certain part of the work, not to mention its actual creator. The third type is total plagiarism, and as the name suggests, it is based on the total stealing of a given job. The fourth is partial plagiarism - in this case we are talking about assigning some elements from a given work and signing them as our own creation. The last one is autoplagiat, and it is based on copying one's own work, which has already been published earlier. Universities and schools have anti-plagiarism systems that check the originality of the work. These programs have the option of blocking or invalidating a given work, it may also lead to the person being held criminally liable. So how do you avoid this unpleasant situation? One of the methods is the synonymization and paraphrase of the text, that is, the modification of the original text while maintaining its meaning. It is most often about transferring information in your own words. But what do you do when you run out of words? Our mixer of synonyms will help in generating unique content using synonymisation, that is, converting words to others, but with the same meaning. The program is fully free and very easy to use. Paraphrase Online save time and enrich the language, they come to help whenever we struggle with how to convert a piece of text. Our program includes the best, most extensive language dictionary, and thus the synonym of almost every popular word. Thanks to the mixture of synonyms and using your own invention, you can create a new, unique text that the anti-plagiarism considers as your own.

Always start with quality content: Quality content means is a unique content on a very specific topic. You have to create unique valuable content which will be more informative for human readers. It’s impossible for a program to produce content that is engaging the users because it just replaces few words without any writing skill. So, It’s a big risk for you if you start with low-quality content and the more risk if you are going to use the alternate version of the articles.
Content reword programming which is regularly called turning programming isn't your best arrangement. An article rewriting tool can help you a lot. A considerable lot of these product projects will turn out total trash in the event that they are used erroneously and regardless of the possibility that used right they won't change the structure and organization of your work enough to trick the greater part of the web indexes. On the off chance that the work should be possible by programming it can likewise be spotted by programming. Genuine paper rewording will bring about another report that will appear to be totally unique to the first with various passages and sentences instead of only a couple of words having been changed all over. Tools such as Spinner Chief can help you.
Owner is a scammer who has been banned from major SEO forums for fraudulent and deceptive practices. You might be willing to look past the fact that the owner of this product creates fake accounts to post fake reviews and lies about the product if the product itself was actually good, but unfortunately Spinner Chief itself is filled with half baked buggy features (which are advertised as working completely) and can't go more than 10 minutes without crashing. All in all it is a complete waste of money and time.
Never let your audience guess what you are trying to say, your writing should literally speak for itself. When your content has too many errors, it becomes difficult to read and understand. Although, one or two errors can be skipped by readers, but glaring grammatical errors can minimize the impact of your content. Also, it can make your writing difficult to read and digest.

I mean you can do that as well of course and it all depends on what SEO project you will be working on. If you just need an extremely high quality article for some Tier 1 project, you can head to the website and do some manual work, but if you need content for, say, your GSA SER campaigns, you just need to connect WordAI to your Kontent Machine and you are good to go. Now, let’s take a look at WordAI’s “Standard” spinner.


Although the idea of quickly being able to create content might sound fantastic, it certainly has its disadvantages. Firstly, Google don’t like badly written content. In the past article spinners have been renown for creating poor quality content. Badly written articles are something that Google hates and you won’t make any human friends with it either.
You do not have to bring about any sort of the change in the structure of the paragraph sufficiently. It would be such an easy way out if you will be jotting down with the notes and explain out with some of the main points into the paragraph. You should be hence rewriting all by means of using the notes and not the original one. Proofreading the document as about 2-3 times definitely.
New customers will receive a huge discount offer. Spin Rewriter gives you a lot of quality written content in a short period of time. Clients receive a 5-day free trial for using their services, but after 5 days you still get 30 additional days to make sure the Spin Rewriter technology is right for you. They allow you to avoid SEO devaluation from duplicate online content. Try it out, and if it’s not exactly right for your business, you’ll receive a refund no questions asked.
When it comes to rewriting articles, there are times where doing it can be a lot stressful than ever, and this is very inconvenient as it can make your work slow and so is your productivity and payday. This is not a good thing for online writers and SEO specialists because this will be all of a hassle for their workday, and can give them a lot of stress.

If your life revolves around writing, perhaps this is what you do for a living then this free article spinner tool is the answer to all your problems. It is the best academic and most SEO friendly paraphrasing tool that enables you to get a rewritten article with great flexibility. This competent instant article spinner helps you make a better attractive and comprehensive article in seconds. You can use tool to get rid of plagiarism or speed up your SEO performance.

Exactly Mark! In my experience you can certainly write around 1000 words per hour, even if you are practically new to blogging. I personally think that spinning articles is just a gimmick that doesn’t really get results but wastes tons of time. The spinning software certainly makes a lot of money for the creators though! They are the ones who are laughing all the way to the bank!
Cross Platform – Being a Mac user I prefer when I can fire up a program locally. WordAi is web based and therefore works on Windows & Macs without issue (Linux as well). SpinnerChief III Ultimate has a Web Api that allows spinning from the web, but we did not have much luck with it, so at this time we consider SpinnerChief a Windows only application and therefore requires me to run it in a virtual Windows Machine using VMWare Fusion. This one is a hard one to call because clearly WordAi wins cross platform, but it doesn’t have all the extras that SpinnerChief offers.
Although the idea of quickly being able to create content might sound fantastic, it certainly has its disadvantages. Firstly, Google don’t like badly written content. In the past article spinners have been renown for creating poor quality content. Badly written articles are something that Google hates and you won’t make any human friends with it either.
SpinnerChief is designed to generate unique articles to provide content for websites and increase site traffic. It does this by spinning one article into multiple versions of itself, replacing certain words, phrases, and sentences with alternate versions of themselves. SpinnerChief can identify parts of speech, correct grammar errors, and use intelligent auto-replace methods until the article is both human-readable and passes Copyscape (a plagiarism checker). The SpinnerChief API allows developers to access SpinnerChief's functions from within other programs and can spin articles in 27 different languages.
WordAI is probably the most famous content spinning service. Many people swear by it and the quality of the content it produces and it is not empty talk. But let’s see how it will spin my short story. WordAI has two modes of spinning – “Standard” and “Turing”, with the latter being the one that produces better results. I will spin the text with both of them.
You do not have to bring about any sort of the change in the structure of the paragraph sufficiently. It would be such an easy way out if you will be jotting down with the notes and explain out with some of the main points into the paragraph. You should be hence rewriting all by means of using the notes and not the original one. Proofreading the document as about 2-3 times definitely.
Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.
!function(n,t){function r(e,n){return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,n)}function i(e){return void 0===e}if(n){var o={},s=n.TraceKit,a=[].slice,l="?";o.noConflict=function(){return n.TraceKit=s,o},o.wrap=function(e){function n(){try{return e.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw o.report(e),e}}return n},o.report=function(){function e(e){l(),h.push(e)}function t(e){for(var n=h.length-1;n>=0;--n)h[n]===e&&h.splice(n,1)}function i(e,n){var t=null;if(!n||o.collectWindowErrors){for(var i in h)if(r(h,i))try{h[i].apply(null,[e].concat(a.call(arguments,2)))}catch(e){t=e}if(t)throw t}}function s(e,n,t,r,s){var a=null;if(w)o.computeStackTrace.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement(w,n,t,e),u();else if(s)a=o.computeStackTrace(s),i(a,!0);else{var l={url:n,line:t,column:r};l.func=o.computeStackTrace.guessFunctionName(l.url,l.line),l.context=o.computeStackTrace.gatherContext(l.url,l.line),a={mode:"onerror",message:e,stack:[l]},i(a,!0)}return!!f&&f.apply(this,arguments)}function l(){!0!==d&&(f=n.onerror,n.onerror=s,d=!0)}function u(){var e=w,n=p;p=null,w=null,m=null,i.apply(null,[e,!1].concat(n))}function c(e){if(w){if(m===e)return;u()}var t=o.computeStackTrace(e);throw w=t,m=e,p=a.call(arguments,1),n.setTimeout(function(){m===e&&u()},t.incomplete?2e3:0),e}var f,d,h=[],p=null,m=null,w=null;return c.subscribe=e,c.unsubscribe=t,c}(),o.computeStackTrace=function(){function e(e){if(!o.remoteFetching)return"";try{var t=function(){try{return new n.XMLHttpRequest}catch(e){return new n.ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")}},r=t();return r.open("GET",e,!1),r.send(""),r.responseText}catch(e){return""}}function t(t){if("string"!=typeof t)return[];if(!r(j,t)){var i="",o="";try{o=n.document.domain}catch(e){}var s=/(.*)\:\/\/([^:\/]+)([:\d]*)\/{0,1}([\s\S]*)/.exec(t);s&&s[2]===o&&(i=e(t)),j[t]=i?i.split("\n"):[]}return j[t]}function s(e,n){var r,o=/function ([^(]*)\(([^)]*)\)/,s=/['"]?([0-9A-Za-z$_]+)['"]?\s*[:=]\s*(function|eval|new Function)/,a="",u=10,c=t(e);if(!c.length)return l;for(var f=0;f0?s:null}function u(e){return e.replace(/[\-\[\]{}()*+?.,\\\^$|#]/g,"\\$&")}function c(e){return u(e).replace("<","(?:<|<)").replace(">","(?:>|>)").replace("&","(?:&|&)").replace('"','(?:"|")').replace(/\s+/g,"\\s+")}function f(e,n){for(var r,i,o=0,s=n.length;or&&(i=s.exec(o[r]))?i.index:null}function h(e){if(!i(n&&n.document)){for(var t,r,o,s,a=[n.location.href],l=n.document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=""+e,h=/^function(?:\s+([\w$]+))?\s*\(([\w\s,]*)\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,p=/^function on([\w$]+)\s*\(event\)\s*\{\s*(\S[\s\S]*\S)\s*\}\s*$/,m=0;m]+)>|([^\)]+))\((.*)\))? in (.*):\s*$/i,o=n.split("\n"),l=[],u=0;u=0&&(g.line=v+x.substring(0,j).split("\n").length)}}}else if(o=d.exec(i[y])){var _=n.location.href.replace(/#.*$/,""),T=new RegExp(c(i[y+1])),E=f(T,[_]);g={url:_,func:"",args:[],line:E?E.line:o[1],column:null}}if(g){g.func||(g.func=s(g.url,g.line));var k=a(g.url,g.line),A=k?k[Math.floor(k.length/2)]:null;k&&A.replace(/^\s*/,"")===i[y+1].replace(/^\s*/,"")?g.context=k:g.context=[i[y+1]],h.push(g)}}return h.length?{mode:"multiline",name:e.name,message:i[0],stack:h}:null}function y(e,n,t,r){var i={url:n,line:t};if(i.url&&i.line){e.incomplete=!1,i.func||(i.func=s(i.url,i.line)),i.context||(i.context=a(i.url,i.line));var o=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(r);if(o&&(i.column=d(o[1],i.url,i.line)),e.stack.length>0&&e.stack[0].url===i.url){if(e.stack[0].line===i.line)return!1;if(!e.stack[0].line&&e.stack[0].func===i.func)return e.stack[0].line=i.line,e.stack[0].context=i.context,!1}return e.stack.unshift(i),e.partial=!0,!0}return e.incomplete=!0,!1}function g(e,n){for(var t,r,i,a=/function\s+([_$a-zA-Z\xA0-\uFFFF][_$a-zA-Z0-9\xA0-\uFFFF]*)?\s*\(/i,u=[],c={},f=!1,p=g.caller;p&&!f;p=p.caller)if(p!==v&&p!==o.report){if(r={url:null,func:l,args:[],line:null,column:null},p.name?r.func=p.name:(t=a.exec(p.toString()))&&(r.func=t[1]),"undefined"==typeof r.func)try{r.func=t.input.substring(0,t.input.indexOf("{"))}catch(e){}if(i=h(p)){r.url=i.url,r.line=i.line,r.func===l&&(r.func=s(r.url,r.line));var m=/ '([^']+)' /.exec(e.message||e.description);m&&(r.column=d(m[1],i.url,i.line))}c[""+p]?f=!0:c[""+p]=!0,u.push(r)}n&&u.splice(0,n);var w={mode:"callers",name:e.name,message:e.message,stack:u};return y(w,e.sourceURL||e.fileName,e.line||e.lineNumber,e.message||e.description),w}function v(e,n){var t=null;n=null==n?0:+n;try{if(t=m(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=p(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=w(e))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}try{if(t=g(e,n+1))return t}catch(e){if(x)throw e}return{mode:"failed"}}function b(e){e=1+(null==e?0:+e);try{throw new Error}catch(n){return v(n,e+1)}}var x=!1,j={};return v.augmentStackTraceWithInitialElement=y,v.guessFunctionName=s,v.gatherContext=a,v.ofCaller=b,v.getSource=t,v}(),o.extendToAsynchronousCallbacks=function(){var e=function(e){var t=n[e];n[e]=function(){var e=a.call(arguments),n=e[0];return"function"==typeof n&&(e[0]=o.wrap(n)),t.apply?t.apply(this,e):t(e[0],e[1])}};e("setTimeout"),e("setInterval")},o.remoteFetching||(o.remoteFetching=!0),o.collectWindowErrors||(o.collectWindowErrors=!0),(!o.linesOfContext||o.linesOfContext<1)&&(o.linesOfContext=11),void 0!==e&&e.exports&&n.module!==e?e.exports=o:"function"==typeof define&&define.amd?define("TraceKit",[],o):n.TraceKit=o}}("undefined"!=typeof window?window:global)},"./webpack-loaders/expose-loader/index.js?require!./shared/require-global.js":function(e,n,t){(function(n){e.exports=n.require=t("./shared/require-global.js")}).call(n,t("../../../lib/node_modules/webpack/buildin/global.js"))}});
×